Gajardo-Vidal, Andrea, Lorca-Puls, Diego L., Crinion, Jennifer T., White, Jitrachote, Seghier, Mohamed L., Leff, Alex P., Hope, Thomas M.H., Ludersdorfer, Philipp, Green, David W., Bowman, Howard, and others. (2018) How distributed processing produces false negatives in voxel-based lesion-deficit analyses. Neuropsychologia, . ISSN 0028-3932. (doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.025) (KAR id:66586)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
![]() |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02... |
Abstract
In this study, we hypothesized that if the same deficit can be caused by damage to one or another part of a
distributed neural system, then voxel-based analyses might miss critical lesion sites because preservation of each
site will not be consistently associated with preserved function. The first part of our investigation used voxelbased
multiple regression analyses of data from 359 right-handed stroke survivors to identify brain regions
where lesion load is associated with picture naming abilities after factoring out variance related to object recognition,
semantics and speech articulation so as to focus on deficits arising at the word retrieval level. A highly
significant lesion-deficit relationship was identified in left temporal and frontal/premotor regions. Post-hoc
analyses showed that damage to either of these sites caused the deficit of interest in less than half the affected
patients (76/162 = 47%). After excluding all patients with damage to one or both of the identified regions, our
second analysis revealed a new region, in the anterior part of the left putamen, which had not been previously
detected because many patients had the deficit of interest after temporal or frontal damage that preserved the
left putamen. The results illustrate how (i) false negative results arise when the same deficit can be caused by
different lesion sites; (ii) some of the missed effects can be unveiled by adopting an iterative approach that
systematically excludes patients with lesions to the areas identified in previous analyses, (iii) statistically significant
voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings can be driven by a subset of patients; (iv) focal lesions to the
identified regions are needed to determine whether the deficit of interest is the consequence of focal damage or
much more extensive damage that includes the identified region; and, finally, (v) univariate voxel-based lesiondeficit
mappings cannot, in isolation, be used to predict outcome in other patients.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.025 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Voxel-based lesion-deficit mapping, Voxel-based morphometry, Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping, stroke, Anomia, Word-finding difficulties |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing |
Depositing User: | Howard Bowman |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2018 11:07 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 11:05 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66586 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):