Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

The Impact of Enterprise Size on Employment Tribunal Incidence and Outcomes: Evidence from Britain

Saridakis, G., Sen-Gupta, S., Edwards, P.K., Storey, D.J. (2008) The Impact of Enterprise Size on Employment Tribunal Incidence and Outcomes: Evidence from Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46 (3). pp. 469-499. ISSN 0007-1080. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:66002)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.

Abstract

Employment Tribunals are the formal means of adjudicating disputes over individual employment rights in the UK. This article hypothesizes that, because small firms favour informality over formality, they are more likely (i) to experience employee claims than large firms; (ii) to be subject to different types of claims; (iii) to settle prior to reaching a formal Tribunal; and (iv) to lose at a Tribunal. Data from the 2003 Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications are used to examine these hypotheses. They are generally supported, although in relation to the third there was no size effect. Furthermore, our results show that firms that have procedures and follow them are more likely to win than those firms that do not have any procedures. Recognizing the benefits of informality, while also ensuring that small firms follow proper standards of procedural fairness, is a policy dilemma that has yet to be resolved.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Marketing, Entrepreneurship and International Business
Depositing User: George Saridakis
Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2018 14:51 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 11:04 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66002 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.