Skip to main content

Janus-headed Intaglio

Crawford, Stephen (2017) Janus-headed Intaglio. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68 (3). pp. 305-316. ISSN 0029-3105. (KAR id:65982)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Click to download this file (1MB) Preview
[thumbnail of s12913-017-2245-9.pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:


The traditional use of research methods is to provide a framework for constructing a project to address particular questions or interests. The idea behind this is that, by utilising these frameworks, research will be assessable by other researchers who are then able to judge any given research output through a common framework, while still allowing each project to stand (or fall) on its own merits. At risk of getting lost, or silenced, in this process is any attention to how the individual researcher understands their own project. This article explores the potential for developing a self-reflective research method. How does the researcher engage with, and understand, their own work? How does this provide a new pathway for disseminating research to others within the academic community? How does an object-centred approach to this self-reflection aid in engaging both the researcher and the audience in a shared experience?

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: 1688 Bill of Rights, methodology, Janus, self-reflection
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School
Depositing User: Stephen Crawford
Date Deposited: 10 Feb 2018 14:51 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 13:52 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.