Crawford, Stephen (2017) Janus-headed Intaglio. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68 (3). pp. 305-316. ISSN 0029-3105. (KAR id:65982)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view... |
Abstract
The traditional use of research methods is to provide a framework for constructing a project to address particular questions or interests. The idea behind this is that, by utilising these frameworks, research will be assessable by other researchers who are then able to judge any given research output through a common framework, while still allowing each project to stand (or fall) on its own merits. At risk of getting lost, or silenced, in this process is any attention to how the individual researcher understands their own project. This article explores the potential for developing a self-reflective research method. How does the researcher engage with, and understand, their own work? How does this provide a new pathway for disseminating research to others within the academic community? How does an object-centred approach to this self-reflection aid in engaging both the researcher and the audience in a shared experience?
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled keywords: | 1688 Bill of Rights, methodology, Janus, self-reflection |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Depositing User: | Stephen Crawford |
Date Deposited: | 10 Feb 2018 14:51 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 11:04 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/65982 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):