Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Species identification by conservation practitioners using online images: accuracy and agreement between experts

Austen, Gail E., Bindemann, Markus, Griffiths, Richard A., Roberts, David L. (2018) Species identification by conservation practitioners using online images: accuracy and agreement between experts. PeerJ, (6:). ISSN 2167-8359. (doi:10.7717/peerj.4157) (KAR id:65785)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/566kB)
[thumbnail of peerj-4157.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Microsoft Excel (supplementary material) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(Microsoft Excel/43kB)
[thumbnail of supplementary material]
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4157

Abstract

Emerging technologies have led to an increase in species observations being recorded via digital images. Such visual records are easily shared, and are often uploaded to online communities when help is required to identify or validate species. Although this is common practice, little is known about the accuracy of species identification from such images. Using online images of newts that are native and non-native to the UK, this study asked holders of great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) licences (issued by UK authorities to permit surveying for this species) to sort these images into groups, and to assign species names to those groups. All of these experts identified the native species, but agreement among these participants was low, with some being cautious in committing to definitive identifications. Individuals’ accuracy was also independent of both their experience and self-assessed ability. Furthermore, mean accuracy was not uniform across species (69–96%). These findings demonstrate the difficulty of accurate identification of newts from a single image, and that expert judgements are variable, even within the same knowledgeable community. We suggest that identification decisions should be made on multiple images and verified by more than one expert, which could improve the reliability of species data.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.7717/peerj.4157
Uncontrolled keywords: Citizen science, Invasive species, Newts, Jizz, Validation, Ecological monitoring, Species observations, Crowdsourced images, Validation
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH541 Ecology
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: David Roberts
Date Deposited: 25 Jan 2018 11:02 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 11:03 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/65785 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.