Square Peg in a Round Hole: the inability of the courts effectively to substitute further procedural rules for due process in the assessment of expert scientific testimony in criminal trials

Dickson, Lisa, Pethick, Stephen (2013) Square Peg in a Round Hole: the inability of the courts effectively to substitute further procedural rules for due process in the assessment of expert scientific testimony in criminal trials. Durham Law Review, 3 . pp. 50-102. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:65088)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	K Law
Divisions:	Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School
Depositing User:	Sian Robertson
Date Deposited:	07 Dec 2017 14:19 UTC
Last Modified:	16 Feb 2021 13:51 UTC
Resource URI:	https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/65088 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

Depositors only (login required):