Dickson, Lisa, Pethick, Stephen (2013) Square Peg in a Round Hole: the inability of the courts effectively to substitute further procedural rules for due process in the assessment of expert scientific testimony in criminal trials. Durham Law Review, 3 . pp. 50-102. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:65088)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. |
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > Kent Law School |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School
|
| Depositing User: | Sian Robertson |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Dec 2017 14:19 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 20 May 2025 13:39 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/65088 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Total Views
Total Views
