Carr, Helen, Cowan, Dave, Wallace, Alison (2017) Producing the Product: A Case Study of Law and Its Absence. Journal of Law and Society, 44 (S1). S93-S110. ISSN 0263-323X. (doi:10.1111/jols.12051) (KAR id:65028)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/201kB) |
![]() |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
![]() |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12051 |
Abstract
In this article, we seek to develop socio-legal studies through a rupturing of the ideas behind the social and the legal, ideas that are most often presumed to exist and are used to explain that which is already there. The ubiquity of law and the omniscience of society have become givens. We use a product called shared ownership as a case study, arguing that the product was given life by a legal document (the lease) which itself represented the translation of a range of different perspectives and audiences (albeit not the consumer), and which, itself, has been translated, most notably in a 2008 High Court decision. That decision counterintuitively found that the lease had created an assured shorthold tenancy (albeit a long one) but, despite its threat to the product, has been largely ignored. We discuss the processes of, and reasons for, the translation through which that ignorance has been induced.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/jols.12051 |
Subjects: | K Law |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Depositing User: | Helen Carr |
Date Deposited: | 06 Dec 2017 09:34 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Jul 2023 13:03 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/65028 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):