Loughnane, Rory (2019) What doesn't happen in Hamlet. Critical Survey, 31 (1-2). pp. 168-186. ISSN 0011-1570. (doi:10.3167/cs.2019.31010213) (KAR id:63452)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/452kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2019.31010213 |
Abstract
W.W. Greg first identified the dumb show in Hamlet as problematic: if Claudius sees the dumb show, which replicates his murder of Old Hamlet in mime, then why does he not react until much later? Many explanations have been offered, and this article responds to (in title and argument) John Dover Wilson’s influential account in What Happens in Hamlet (1935) which inspired much further debate. First discussing the anomalous nature of the dumb show in Hamlet, before turning to the different versions of the dumb show as they appear in the three substantive texts of Hamlet, this article considers the nature and content of the information supplied by dumb shows and the critical arguments that can be developed from these slippery inset performances.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.3167/cs.2019.31010213 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Shakespeare, Hamlet, quartos, drama |
Subjects: |
P Language and Literature P Language and Literature > PR English literature |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of English |
Depositing User: | Rory Loughnane |
Date Deposited: | 16 Sep 2017 13:58 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:58 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/63452 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):