Kirkpatrick, Daniel (2017) Why negotiate when you can criminalise? Lessons for conflict transformation from Northern Ireland and South Africa. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, . ISSN 1057-610X. E-ISSN 1521-0731. (doi:10.1080/1057610X.2017.1338055) (KAR id:61936)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/349kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1338055 |
Abstract
Research on negotiating with criminalised actors generally assumes the criminal label as a given, neglecting the significance of criminalisation itself. This article addresses this gap arguing that the processes of criminalisation and decriminalisation embody important incentive structures affecting peace negotiations. Specifically, for conflict transformation to effectively occur, criminalisation needs to be orientated away from a criminalisation of actors and on to specific acts to legitimise nonviolent political expression and negotiations. These arguments will be advanced through a comparative study of Northern Ireland and South Africa, adopting a conflict transformation framework, and drawing on sixty-three original interviews and archival material.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1338055 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | conflict transformation, negotiation, criminalisation, non-violence, decriminalisation |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations |
Depositing User: | D.W. Kirkpatrick |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jun 2017 08:19 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:56 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/61936 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):