Winter, Samantha L., Challis, John H. (2017) Classifying the variability in impact and active peak vertical ground reaction forces during running using DFA and ARFIMA models. Human Movement Science, 51 . pp. 153-160. ISSN 0167-9457. E-ISSN 1872-7646. (doi:10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.003) (KAR id:60362)
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/679kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.003 |
Abstract
The vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) during rear-foot striking running typically exhibits peaks referred to as the impact peak and the active peak; their timings and magnitudes have been implicated in injury. Identifying the structure of time-series can provide insight into associated control processes. The purpose here was to detect long-range correlations associated with the time from first contact to impact peak (TIP) and active peak (TAP); and the magnitudes of impact (IPM) and active peaks (APM) using a Detrended Fluctuation Analysis, and Auto-Regressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average models. Twelve subjects performed an 8 minute trial at their preferred running speed on an instrumented treadmill. TIP, TAP; IPM, and APM were identified from the VGRF profile for each footfall. TIP and TAP time-series did not demonstrate long-range correlations, conversely IPM and APM time-series did. Short range correlations appeared as well as or instead of long range correlations for IPM. Conversely pure powerlaw behaviour was demonstrated in 11 of the 24 time series for APM, and long range dependencies along with short range correlations were present in a further 9 time series. It has been hypothesised that control mechanisms for IPM and APM are different, these results support this hypothesis.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.003 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Variability Measurement; Running; Motor Processes |
Subjects: |
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation. Leisure > Sports sciences Q Science > QP Physiology (Living systems) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Sport and Exercise Sciences |
Depositing User: | Samantha Winter |
Date Deposited: | 27 Feb 2017 20:36 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:53 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/60362 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):