Jones, Claire (2016) A Barrier to Medical Treatment? British Medical Practitioners, Medical Appliances and the Patent Controversy, 1870 – 1920. British Journal for the History of Science, 49 (4). pp. 601-625. ISSN 0007-0874. (doi:10.1017/S000708741600114X) (KAR id:59784)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/423kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
|
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708741600114X |
Abstract
From the late nineteenth century onwards there emerged an increasingly diverse response to escalating patenting activity. Inventors were generally supportive of legislation that made patenting more accessible, while others, especially manufacturers, saw patenting culture as an impediment. The medical profession claimed that patenting represented ‘a barrier to medical treatment’ and was thus detrimental to the nation's health, yet, as I argue, the profession's development of strict codes of conduct forbidding practitioners from patenting resulted in rebellion from some members, who increasingly sought protection for their inventions. Such polarized opinions within the medical trade continue to affect current medical practice today.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1017/S000708741600114X |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of History |
Depositing User: | M.R.L. Hurst |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jan 2017 14:14 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:52 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/59784 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):