Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Beyond the Balancing Scales: The Importance of Prejudice and Dialogue in A Local Authority v E and Others

Kong, Camillia (2014) Beyond the Balancing Scales: The Importance of Prejudice and Dialogue in A Local Authority v E and Others. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 26 (2). pp. 216-236. ISSN 1358-8184. (KAR id:58515)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(PDF/432kB)
[thumbnail of Beyond the Balancing Scales 2.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Microsoft Word Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Beyond the Balancing Scales 2.docx]

Abstract

In May 2012, in A Local Authority v E and Others,' a best interests ruling was made under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to coercively treat a severely anorexic woman, E, against her will. The best interests decision was purportedly reached through a process of judicialbalancing; however there is something deeply unsatisfactory about this account. This commentary delves beyond the expressed balancing method and applies the tools of philosophical hermeneutics to both understand and challenge the best interests ruling in A Local Authority v E and Others. First, the hermeneutic concept of 'prejudice' makes explicit the implicit judgments determining the best interests decision in this case. Secondly the commentary challenges the best interests decision in two ways: (1) the hermeneutic emphasis on dialogical understanding provides grounds for questioning the judge's failure to integrate the views of E and her wider decision community (including family and long-term clinicians); (2) the ruling could be deemed invalid due to the implicit application of a status-based rather than statutory functional test to assess E's current and retrospective capacity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: Adjudication, anorexia, best interests, hermeneutics
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
K Law
K Law > KD England and Wales
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages
Funders: Organisations -1 not found.
Depositing User: Camillia Kong
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2016 12:49 UTC
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2022 11:01 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/58515 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.