Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

‘Procedes Huc’: Voltaire, Newton, and Locke in Lettres Philosophiques

Fowler, James (2016) ‘Procedes Huc’: Voltaire, Newton, and Locke in Lettres Philosophiques. Neophilologus, . pp. 1-14. ISSN 0028-2677. E-ISSN 1572-8668. (doi:10.1007/s11061-016-9501-9) (KAR id:58292)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(PDF/351kB)
[thumbnail of procedes huc.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of procedes huc.docx]
Official URL:
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-016-9501-9

Abstract

In Lettres philosophiques, Letter XIII is devoted to Locke, as are Letters XIV–XVII to Newton. The ordering of these letters is not adequately explained by comparing the dates of birth or death of the two thinkers. For the Letter on Locke not only precedes but also ‘frames’ those on Newton, in the sense that it provides the reader with a guide through the philosophical intricacies of Letters XIV–XVII. This works in two ways. On the one hand, in order to defend Newton against his detractors Voltaire broadly adopts Locke’s perspective on the relation among words, ideas and things. On the other hand, he subtly and misleadingly grafts Locke’s epistemology onto the Principia, though it differs from Newton’s epistemology in significant respects. For Locke, unlike Newton, holds that we can identify fixed, permanent limits concerning what kind of thing humanity can know of matter and the universe. Voltaire presents Newton’s ideas as though they respected Locke’s limits. However, we can glimpse Voltaire’s own attitude in the final words of Letter XV: ‘Procedes huc, et non ibis amplius’: Voltaire agrees more closely with Locke than Newton concerning the limits of epistemology.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1007/s11061-016-9501-9
Uncontrolled keywords: Voltaire, Lettres philosophiques,Locke, Newton, Epistemology, Natural philosophy
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PC Romance philology and languages
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages
Depositing User: Jacqueline Martlew
Date Deposited: 31 Oct 2016 16:35 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 10:49 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/58292 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Fowler, James.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.