Malksoo, Maria (2011) The Challenge of Liminality for International Relations Theory. Review of International Studies, 38 (2). pp. 481-494. ISSN 0260-2105. (doi:10.1017/S0260210511000829) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:57061)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000829 |
Abstract
This article builds a concise case for seriousengagement with liminality in IR theory. There is substantial, yet unrecognised, potential for the application of liminality
across a range of International Relations (IR) problems, from the study of the preeminent
IR concepts – power, security, sovereignty – to the analysis of the agentstructure
relationship, state formation, and recognition, war and political violence,
structural transformation of the international system, extraordinary politics during
the times of transition, and the constitution of political identities. Applied to IR theory, liminality introduces an emancipatory research agenda, revealing the radical
promise of political anthropology for the study of International Relations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1017/S0260210511000829 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | liminality, IR theory, political anthropology, war, structure |
Subjects: | J Political Science |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations |
Depositing User: | Maria Malksoo |
Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2016 10:56 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:47 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/57061 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):