Funnell, Warwick N. (2015) Performance Auditing and Adjudicating Political Disputes. Financial Accountability and Management, 31 (1). pp. 92-111. ISSN 0267-4424. (doi:10.1111/faam.12046) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:56676)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faam.12046 |
Abstract
Performance audits have provided governments with new opportunities to take advantage of the public sector auditor's moral legitimacy as an agent of accountability who is independent of government. With particular reference to a recent performance audit by the Australian Auditor-General which the Prime Minister called for after he was accused of lying to the Parliament, and adopting insights from Suchman's theory of legitimacy, this paper confirms that after an extended, intense period of resistance governments now recognise performance audits and the Auditor-General's considerable reputation for integrity as potentially potent ways to enhance their political legitimacy.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/faam.12046 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | performance auditing; political legitimacy;independence |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Accounting and Finance |
Depositing User: | Warwick Funnell |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jul 2016 10:15 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:46 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/56676 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):