Cowan, Dave, Carr, Helen (2016) What’s the use of a hashtag? A case study. Journal of Law and Society, 43 (3). pp. 416-443. ISSN 0263-323X. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00761.x) (KAR id:56098)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/312kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00761.x |
Abstract
Although there are now sophisticated techniques for the analysis of social media, socio-legal studies has yet to draw on them fully. In this article, we demonstrate how Twitter can produce insights about protest, law, and legality, through a case study of protests against the ‘bedroom tax’. The first involved challenging a policy in the courts using a test case or cases. We discuss the litigation strategies and the mess they created and counterpose those strategies with those of four prolific ‘tweeps’ who participated in our study. We argue that, despite the small number of participants, these people have, in their own way, been enormously influential and made things happen. Our position is not evaluative of the different strategies – but, rather, one that recognizes that legality is mobilized in different ways.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00761.x |
Uncontrolled keywords: | bedroom tax; social media; law and legality |
Subjects: | K Law |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Depositing User: | Sarah Slowe |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jun 2016 03:34 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:45 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/56098 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):