Chung, Heejung (2016) Dualization and subjective employment insecurity: Explaining the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers across 23 European countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 40 (3). pp. 700-729. ISSN 0143-831X. (doi:10.1177/0143831X16656411) (KAR id:55975)
PDF
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X16656411 |
Abstract
Dualization theory posits that certain institutions cause dualization in the labour market, yet how institutions deepen the subjective insecurity divide between insiders and outsiders has not been examined. This paper examines this question using data from 23 European countries in 2008/9. Results show that the subjective employment insecurity divide between permanent and temporary workers varies significantly across different countries. Corporatist countries, with stronger unions, have larger subjective insecurity divides between permanent and temporary workers. However, this is because permanent workers feel more secure in these countries rather than because temporary workers are more exposed to feelings of insecurity.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/0143831X16656411 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Employment insecurity, Dualization, Institutions, Industrial Relations, Permanent contracts, Multi-level modelling |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Lucie Patch |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2016 14:06 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:45 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/55975 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):