Skip to main content

Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

Sutherland, William J., Mitchell, Roger, Walsh, Jessica, Amano, Tatsya, Ausden, Malcolm, Beebee, Trevor J.C., Bullock, David, Daniels, Mike, Deutsch, James, Griffiths, Richard A., and others. (2013) Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes. Conservation Evidence, 10 . pp. 1-3. ISSN 1758-2067.

PDF - Publisher pdf
Download (159kB) Preview
[img]
Preview

Abstract

Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of interventions.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Q Science > QK Botany
Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Richard Griffiths
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2016 09:24 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 17:01 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/54249 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year