Skip to main content

Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes

Sutherland, William J., Mitchell, Roger, Walsh, Jessica, Amano, Tatsya, Ausden, Malcolm, Beebee, Trevor J.C., Bullock, David, Daniels, Mike, Deutsch, James, Griffiths, Richard A., and others. (2013) Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes. Conservation Evidence, 10 . pp. 1-3. ISSN 1758-2067. (KAR id:54249)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English
Download (159kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Sutherland et al 2013 Cons Evidence.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format

Abstract

Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and

help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of

and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are

Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of

interventions.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Q Science > QK Botany
Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Richard Griffiths
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2016 09:24 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 13:33 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/54249 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Griffiths, Richard A.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-1013
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year