Sutherland, William J., Mitchell, Roger, Walsh, Jessica, Amano, Tatsya, Ausden, Malcolm, Beebee, Trevor J.C., Bullock, David, Daniels, Mike, Deutsch, James, Griffiths, Richard A., and others. (2013) Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes. Conservation Evidence, 10 . pp. 1-3. ISSN 1758-2067. (KAR id:54249)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/148kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader |
Abstract
Effective conservation requires a step change in the way practitioners can contribute to science and
can have access to research outputs. The journal Conservation Evidence was established in 2004 to
help practitioners surmount several obstacles they face when attempting to document the effects of
their conservation actions scientifically. It is easily and freely accessible online. It is free to publish in
and it enables global communication of the effects of practical trials and experiments, which are
virtually impossible to get published in most scientific journals. The driving force behind
Conservation Evidence is the need to generate and share scientific information about the effects of
interventions.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: |
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology) Q Science > QK Botany Q Science > QL Zoology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology) |
Depositing User: | Richard Griffiths |
Date Deposited: | 22 Feb 2016 09:24 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:41 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/54249 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):