Biggs, Jeremy, Ewald, Naomi, Valentini, Alice, Gaboriaud, Coline, Dejean, Tony, Griffiths, Richard A., Foster, Jim, Wilkinson, John W., Arnell, Andy, Brotherton, Peter, and others. (2014) Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biological Conservation, 183 . pp. 19-28. ISSN 0006-3207. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:54245)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029 |
Abstract
The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) is rapidly emerging as a potentially valuable survey technique for
rare or hard to survey freshwater organisms. For the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) in the UK, the
substantial cost and manpower requirements of traditional survey methods have hampered attempts to
assess the status of the species. We tested whether eDNA could provide the basis for a national citizen
science-based monitoring programme for great crested newts by (i) comparing the effectiveness of eDNA
monitoring with torch counts, bottle trapping and egg searches and (ii) assessing the ability of volunteers
to collect eDNA samples throughout the newt’s UK range. In 35 ponds visited four times through the
breeding season, eDNA detected newts on 139 out of 140 visits, a 99.3% detection rate. Bottle traps, torch
counts and egg searches were significantly less effective, detecting newts 76%, 75% and 44% of the time.
eDNA was less successful at predicting newt abundance being positively, but weakly, correlated with
counts of the number of newts. Volunteers successfully collected eDNA samples across the UK with
219 of 239 sites (91.3%) correctly identified as supporting newts. 8.7% of sites generated false negatives,
either because of very small newt populations or practical difficulties in sample collection. There were no
false positives. Overall, we conclude that eDNA is a highly effective survey method and could be used as
the basis for a national great crested newt monitoring programme.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Environmental DNA; Citizen science; Freshwater; Biodiversity conservation; Triturus cristatus; qPCR |
Subjects: |
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH541 Ecology Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology) Q Science > QL Zoology |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology) |
Depositing User: | Richard Griffiths |
Date Deposited: | 22 Feb 2016 08:58 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:41 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/54245 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):