Higgitt, Rebekah F. (2004) Astronomers against Newton? Francis Baily’s Account of the First Astronomer Royal. Endeavour, 28 . pp. 20-24. ISSN 0160-9327. (doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.01.012) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:53942)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.01.012 |
Abstract
Francis Baily's publication of the manuscripts of John Flamsteed, the first Astronomer Royal, provoked a furious response. Flamsteed had quarrelled with Isaac Newton, and described him in terms unforgivable to those who claimed him as a paragon of all virtues, both moral and scientific. Baily was condemned for putting Flamsteed's complaints in the public sphere. However, his supporters saw his work as a critique of the excessive hero-worship accorded to Newton. Written when the word 'scientist' had been newly coined, this work and the debates it provoked gives us an insight into contemporary views of the role of the man of science and of the use of science to back political, religious and moral positions.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.01.012 |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of History |
Depositing User: | M.R.L. Hurst |
Date Deposited: | 02 Feb 2016 12:01 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:41 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/53942 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):