Fraser, Robert, Cook, David, Mumford, John D., Wilby, Andy, Waage, Jeff K. (2006) Managing Outbreaks of Invasive Species: Eradication Versus Suppression. International Journal of Pest Management, 52 (4). pp. 261-268. ISSN 0967-0874. (doi:10.1080/09670870600795930) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:5195)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
| Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670870600795930 |
Abstract
A framework is developed to evaluate eradication as one of three alternative management responses to an outbreak of an invasive species: eradication, suppression or no action. This framework can be used to establish under what conditions an eradication option could provide an expected net economic benefit, and whether this net benefit exceeds that of the other two options. The eradication option is more likely to be preferred in situations where there is an immediate export benefit that is derived from eradication of the outbreak, and also the uncertainty associated with the likely success of eradication is low.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/09670870600795930 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | invasive species; eradication; export benefit |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
| Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Kent Business School (do not use) |
| Depositing User: | Robert Fraser |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Sep 2008 11:12 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 09:37 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/5195 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Altmetric
Altmetric
