Fraser, Robert (2000) Is Risk-sharing Taxation in Society's Best Interests if Prices are Log-normally Distributed? Resources Policy, 26 (4). pp. 219-225. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:5182)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. |
Abstract
This paper contributes to our understanding of the perceived benefits for society of risk-sharing resource taxation. In the particular context of log-normally distributed prices a model is developed which enables comparison of risk-sharing resource taxation with an alternative in determining the overall return to society from auctioning an extraction lease. The main finding of the paper is a potential exception to the general preference for risk-sharing resource taxation if the bidding firms are effectively risk neutral. This exception is illustrated numerically in the context of the impact of increased price uncertainty, but it is shown not to be robust with respect to divergences from risk neutrality in the risk attitudes of firms. Consequently, it is concluded that the choice of risk-sharing resource taxation is likely to be in society's best interests, regardless of the probability distribution of prices.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled keywords: | Log-normal prices; Risk-sharing; Resource taxation |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Kent Business School (do not use) |
Depositing User: | Robert Fraser |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2008 18:11 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 09:37 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/5182 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):