Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Perceived Organizational Support, Perceived Resource Loss, and Psychological health: The Moderating Effect of Negative Affectivity

Marchand, Catherine, Vandenberghe, Christian (2015) Perceived Organizational Support, Perceived Resource Loss, and Psychological health: The Moderating Effect of Negative Affectivity. Travail Humain, 78 (3). pp. 193-216. ISSN 0041-1868. E-ISSN 2104-3663. (doi:10.3917/th.783.0193) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:50762)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/th.783.0193

Abstract

This article presents the results of an empirical study looking at the relationships among perceived organizational support, anticipated and actual resource loss perceptions, and three dimensions of psychological distress, i.e., depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Moreover, the trait of negative affectivity was used as a moderator of the effects of perceived organizational support. We used conservation of resources theory as a framework for the study. Essentially, conservation of resources theory states that individuals strive to retain resources so as to build their well-being and that stress symptoms appear when individuals perceive or anticipate resource loss and/or think they won’t be able to gain resources (Hobfoll, 2002). Our reasoning in this paper is that perceived organizational support reduces employees’ perception of resource loss and of being unable to gain resources, and through that psychological mechanism reduces psychological distress. We also theorized that these mechanisms would be stronger among individuals with high levels of negative affectivity, as these individuals may be more fragile and would particularly need to be supported in order for them to build their resilience. We conducted an empirical study testing the above predictions using a sample of 138 contact service employees from four Canadian organizations. Consistent with predictions, analyses revealed that perceived organizational support was negatively related to perceived actual resource loss (yet was unrelated to anticipated resource loss). Moreover, perceived organizational support acted as a reducer of depression, anxiety, and fatigue, through the mediation of a reduced perception of actual resource loss. Moreover, perceived organizational support’s effects were amplified under conditions of high trait negative affectivity. This study’s results (a) contribute to improve our understanding of the dynamics of personal and social resources in the workplace, (b) highlight the importance of resource loss perceptions in the stress process, and (c) clarify the process through which perceived organizational support influences employees’ psychological well-being. This study’s findings also have implications for practice as they suggest that organizations can reduce employee distress either by demonstrating indications of support to employees or by encouraging the development of more positive perceptions of personal resources. Finally, we also discuss the meaning of the present findings for how conservation of resources theory principles can be integrated within the theory of perceived organizational support.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.3917/th.783.0193
Uncontrolled keywords: perceived organizational support negative affectivity anticipated and actual resource loss depression anxiety fatigue
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies
Depositing User: Catherine Marchand
Date Deposited: 05 Oct 2015 09:02 UTC
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2022 10:59 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/50762 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.