Mist, Joseph J., Gibson, Stuart J., Solomon, Christopher J. (2015) Comparing Evolutionary Operators, Search Spaces, and Evolutionary Algorithms in the Construction of Facial Composites. Informatica, . pp. 135-145. ISSN 0350-5596. (KAR id:49161)
PDF
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/848kB) |
![]() |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://www.informatica.si/index.php/informatica |
Abstract
Facial composite construction is one of the most successful applications of interactive evolutionary computation.
In spite of this, previous work in the area of composite construction has not investigated the
algorithm design options in detail. We address this issue with four experiments. In the first experiment a
sorting task is used to identify the 12 most salient dimensions of a 30-dimensional search space. In the second
experiment the performances of two mutation and two recombination operators for interactive genetic
algorithms are compared. In the third experiment three search spaces are compared: a 30-dimensional
search space, a mathematically reduced 12-dimensional search space, and a 12-dimensional search space
formed from the 12 most salient dimensions. Finally, we compare the performances of an interactive
genetic algorithm to interactive differential evolution. Our results show that the facial composite construction
process is remarkably robust to the choice of evolutionary operator(s), the dimensionality of the search
space, and the choice of interactive evolutionary algorithm. We attribute this to the imprecise nature of human
face perception and differences between the participants in how they interact with the algorithms.
Povzetek: Kompozitna gradnja obrazov je ena izmed najbolj uspešnih aplikacij interaktivnega evolucijskega
ra?cunanja. Kljub temu pa do zdaj na podro?cju kompozitne gradnje niso bile podrobno raziskane
možnosti snovanja algoritma. To vprašanje smo obravnavali s štirimi poskusi. V prvem je uporabljeno
sortiranje za identifikacijo 12 najbolj izstopajo?cih dimenzij 30-dimenzionalnega preiskovalnega prostora.
V drugem primerjamo u?cinkovitost dveh mutacij in dveh rekombinacijskih operaterjev za interaktivni
genetski algoritem. V tretjem primerjamo tri preiskovalne prostore: 30-dimenzionalni, matemati?cno reducirani
12-dimenzionalni in 12-dimenzionalni prostor sestavljen iz 12 najpomembnejših dimenzij. Na
koncu smo primerjali uspešnost interaktivnega genetskega algoritma z interaktivno diferencialno evolucijo.
Rezultati kažejo, da je proces kompozitne gradnje obrazov izredno robusten glede na izbiro evolucijskega
operatorja(-ev), dimenzionalnost preiskovalnega prostora in izbiro interaktivnega evolucijskega algoritma.
To pripisujemo nenatan?cni naravi percepcije in razlikam med interakcijami uporabnikov z algoritmom.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Physics and Astronomy |
Depositing User: | Stuart Gibson |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2015 15:15 UTC |
Last Modified: | 09 Dec 2022 01:09 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/49161 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):