Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer (2015) Against The Bifurcation Of Virtue. Nous, 51 (2). pp. 291-301. ISSN 0029-4624. E-ISSN 1468-0068. (doi:10.1111/nous.12102) (KAR id:47947)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/331kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12102 |
Abstract
It has become customary in the virtue epistemological literature to distinguish between responsibilist and reliabilist virtue theories. More recently, certain problems affecting the former have prompted epistemologists to suggest that this distinction in virtue theory maps on to a distinction in virtue, specifically between character and faculty virtue. I argue that we lack good reason to bifurcate virtue in this manner, and that this moreover counts in favor of the virtue reliabilist.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/nous.12102 |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages |
Depositing User: | Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij |
Date Deposited: | 12 Apr 2015 09:39 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:31 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/47947 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):