Baker, Patricia A (1999) Soranus and the Pompeii Speculum: The Sociology of Gynaecology and Roman Perceptions of the Female Body. In: Baker, Patricia A and Forcey, C. and Jundi, S. and Witcher, R., eds. TRAC 98: The Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Proceedings 1998. Oxbow Press, Oxford, pp. 141-150. ISBN 978-1-900188-86-9. (doi:10.16995/trac1998_141_150) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:47737)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://trac.org.uk/pubs/#trac-1998-leicester-open-... |
Abstract
The speculum is a fascinating Roman surgical artefact because its precision design shows an
acute awareness of the anatomy of the female body (Figure la). The priapiscus of the Roman
specula is rounded, not pointed, so as not to rub or cut the cervix. Archigenes of Apamea, as
recorded in Paul of Aegina (6.73), explains its use and states that before the instrument was
placed in the vagina, the woman was measured to ensure the priapiscus was not too long, if it
was, then compresses where placed on the labia to shorten the priapiscus thereby protecting the
cervix from injury. The design of the instrument, and the proposed care taken in its use, is an
indication that the female body was a respected concern in a medical context, suggesting the
possibility that the Roman female was more highly regarded than often represented both in
general works and in more detailed studies of Roman women, where the female is implicitly
described as subordinate (e.g. Allason-Jones 1989). Here a focus on the philosophy and practice
of Roman medicine will be employed to illustrate that these implicit assumptions are not always
as unproblematic as often portrayed. The speculum only provides one indication of how Roman
doctors perceived the body. To gain a more precise idea about the opinions held in medical
thinking it is necessary to examine other aspects of Roman medicine such as medical literature,
archaeological and epigraphic remains, and religion. The questions asked of these concern how
the medical perspective influenced wider perceptions of the female body, and conversely how
the popular understandings influenced the medical comprehension of the woman's body. It will
be seen that the social constructs of the body for both men and woman are never clearly defined
as there are many contradictions in the juxtaposition of the body and society (Turner 1996).
Anthropological studies of many different cultures - Native American Indians, South Pacific
Islanders and African societies to name just a few - demonstrate that attitudes towards the
natural functions of the female, such as menstruation, pregnancy and menopause, often reflect
specific beliefs held towards females and influence the role and status which women hold in
their societies (Moore 1988:16-7). This also applies to Greek and Roman women. Although this
paper concentrates on the latter, the gynaecological literature of the Greeks must be considered
for it creates a context, illustrating how medical ideas developed. Furthermore, the differences in
medical texts dating from roughly the same periods are used to demonstrate the complexity of
attitudes towards the female body in a single area of thought.
Item Type: | Book section |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.16995/trac1998_141_150 |
Subjects: | C Auxiliary Sciences of History > CC Archaeology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages |
Depositing User: | Fiona Symes |
Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2015 14:01 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:31 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/47737 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):