Brown, Anna (2015) Personality Assessment, Forced-Choice. In: Wright, J.D., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2nd Edition. Elsevier. (doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25084-8) (KAR id:44775)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/371kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25084... |
Abstract
Instead of responding to questionnaire items one at a time, respondents may be forced to make a choice between two or more items measuring the same or different traits. The forced-choice format eliminates uniform response biases, although the research on its effectiveness in reducing the effects of impression management is inconclusive. Until recently, forced-choice questionnaires were scaled in relation to person means (ipsative data), providing information for intra-individual assessments only. Item response modeling enabled proper scaling of forced-choice data, so that inter-individual comparisons may be made. New forced-choice applications in personality assessment and directions for future research are discussed.
Item Type: | Book section |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25084-8 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | forced-choice format, ipsative data, single-stimulus format, multidimensional IRT, comparative judgments, absolute judgments, dominance models, ideal-point models, unfolding |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HA Statistics |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Anna Brown |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2014 10:20 UTC |
Last Modified: | 09 Dec 2022 09:40 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/44775 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):