Hertel, Guido, Kerr, Norbert L., Scheffler, Marion, Geister, Susanne, Messé, Lawrence A. (2000) Exploring the Köhler Motivation Gain Effect: Impression Management and Spontaneous Goal Setting. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 31 (4). pp. 204-220. ISSN 0044-3514. E-ISSN 2235-1477. (doi:10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.204) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:42453)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.204 |
Abstract
Recent research on the “Köhler effect” (e. g., Hertel, Kerr, & Messé, 2000a,b) has demonstrated that persons increase their effort when working with a stronger coworker compared to when working as individuals. One pre-condition for these motivation gains was a conjunctive task structure, suggesting that high instrumentality of the weaker worker's performance for the group outcome is crucial for the effect to occur. Two experiments were conducted to replicate and further explore these instrumentality effects using a physical persistence paradigm. Experiment 1 compared anonymous and non-anonymous teams working conjunctively to test whether collective motives (maximizing group's outcome) or individualistic interests (impression management) are more likely to underlie the Köhler motivation gain effect. Results replicated overall motivation gains and showed only slight effects of the anonymity variation, suggesting that the motivation gains are more a product of collective motives than individualistic interests. In Experiment 2, spontaneous goal setting processes were explored as a possible mediator of the Köhler motivation gain effect. Comparing conjunctive and additive task conditions for weaker group members again demonstrated that high instrumentality is crucial for the Köhler motivation gain effect. Moreover, while there was no reliable difference between these conditions in reported goal setting, simulating high instrumentality goals by explicit instruction in another additive task condition did lead to significant motivation gains.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.204 |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | M.L. Barnoux |
Date Deposited: | 19 Aug 2014 13:29 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:26 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/42453 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):