Wegener, Duane T., Kerr, Norbert L., Fleming, Monique A., Petty, Richard E. (2000) Flexible corrections of juror judgments: Implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6 (3). pp. 629-654. ISSN 1076-8971. E-ISSN 1939-1528. (doi:10.1037//1076-8971.6.3.629) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:42452)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
| Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.6.3.629 |
Abstract
The Flexible Correction Model (FCM, D. T. Wegener & R. E. Petty, 1997; D. T. Wegener, R. E. Petty, & M. Dunn, 1998) conceptualizes efforts at bias correction (i.e., attempts to remove influences that are perceived as illegitimate or unwanted) as guided by people's naive theories (perceptions) of the influences at work in that judgment setting. In this article, the authors present this model, discuss the general support for this model outside of courtroom judgment, and discuss a variety of implications of this model for courtroom judgment in general and for the impact of judges' instructions to juries in particular.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1037//1076-8971.6.3.629 |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
| Depositing User: | M.L. Barnoux |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Aug 2014 13:27 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:26 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/42452 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Altmetric
Altmetric
