Jordanous, Anna (2012) Evaluating computational creativity: a standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems and its application. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Sussex. (KAR id:42388)
PDF
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/3MB) |
Preview |
Official URL: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/44741/1/Jordanous,_Anna_Ka... |
Abstract
This thesis proposes SPECS: a Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems.
No methodology has been accepted as standard for evaluating the creativity of a system in the
field of computational creativity and the multi-faceted and subjective nature of creativity generates
substantial definitional issues. Evaluative practice has developed a general lack of rigour and systematicity,
hindering research progress.
SPECS is a standardised and systematic methodology for evaluating computational creativity. It
is flexible enough to be applied to a variety of different types of creative system and adaptable to
specific demands in different types of creativity. In the three-stage process of evaluation, researchers
are required to be specific about what creativity entails in the domain they work in and what standards
they test a system’s creativity by. To assist researchers, definitional issues are investigated and a set
of components representing aspects of creativity is presented, which was empirically derived using
computational linguistics analysis. These components are recommended for use within SPECS, being
offered as a general definition of creativity that can be customised to account for any specific priorities
for creativity in a given domain.
SPECS is applied in a case study for detailed comparisons of the creativity of three musical improvisation
systems, identifying which systems are more creative than others and why. In a second
case study, SPECS is used to capture initial impressions on the creativity of systems presented at a
2011 computational creativity research event. Five systems performing different creative tasks are
compared and contrasted.
These case studies exemplify the valuable information that can be obtained on a system’s strengths
and weaknesses. SPECS gives researchers vital feedback for improving their systems’ creativity,
informing further progress in computational creativity research.
Item Type: | Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)) |
---|---|
Subjects: |
Q Science > Q Science (General) > Q335 Artificial intelligence Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA 75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing |
Depositing User: | Anna Jordanous |
Date Deposited: | 18 Aug 2014 10:37 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:26 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/42388 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):