Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J., Harris, Michael P., Morgan, Byron J. T., Freeman, Stephen N., Wanless, Sarah (2014) Exploring the consequences of reducing survey effort for detecting individual and temporal variability in survival. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51 (2). pp. 534-543. ISSN 0021-8901. (doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12214) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:41240)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12214 |
Abstract
1. Long-term monitoring programmes often involve substantial input of skilled staff time. In
mark–recapture studies, considerable effort is usually devoted to both marking and recaptur-
ing/resighting individuals. Given increasing budgetary constraints, it is essential to streamline
field protocols to minimize data redundancy while still achieving targets such as detecting
trends or ecological effects.
2. We evaluated different levels of field effort investment in marking and resighting individu-
als by resampling existing mark–recapture–recovery data to construct plausible scenarios of
changes in field protocols. We demonstrate the method with 26 years data from a common
guillemot Uria aalge monitoring programme at a major North Sea colony. We also assess the
impact of stopping the ringing of chicks on our ability to study population demography using
integrated population models (IPM) fitted to data including information on breeding adults.
Different data sets were removed artificially to explore the ability to compensate for missing
data.
3. Current ringing effort at this colony appears adequate but resighting effort could be
halved while still maintaining the capacity to monitor first-year survival and detect the effect
of hatch date on survival prospects.
4. The IPM appears robust for estimating survival, productivity or abundance of the breed-
ing population, but has limited capacity to recover year-specific first-year survival when chick
data are omitted. If productivity were not monitored, the inclusion of chick data would be
essential to estimate it, albeit imprecisely.
5. Synthesis and applications. Post-study evaluation can help streamline existing long-term
environmental monitoring programmes. To our knowledge, this study is the first use of data
thinning of existing mark–recapture–recovery data to identify potential field effort reductions.
We also highlight how alternative monitoring scenarios can be evaluated with integrated pop-
ulation models when data are collected on different aspects of demography and abundance.
When effort reduction is necessary, both approaches provide decision-support tools for
adjusting field protocols to collect demographic data. The framework has broad applicability
to other taxa and demographic parameters, provided suitable long-term data are available,
and we discuss its use in different contexts.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/1365-2664.12214 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | data thinning, hidden parameters, individual covariates, integrated population model, juvenile survival, long-term monitoring, mark–recapture–recovery, productivity, survey design, Uria aalge |
Subjects: |
Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA276 Mathematical statistics Q Science > QH Natural history > QH541 Ecology Q Science > QL Zoology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science |
Depositing User: | Byron Morgan |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2014 12:41 UTC |
Last Modified: | 17 Aug 2022 10:57 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/41240 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):