Procter, Susan, Wilson, Patricia M., Brooks, Fiona, Kendall, Sally (2013) Success and failure in integrated models of nursing for long term conditions: Multiple case studies of whole systems. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50 (5). pp. 632-643. ISSN 0020-7489. (doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.007) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:39064)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.007 |
Abstract
Background: Current projections indicate that the UK faces a 252% increase in people aged
over 65 with one or more long term conditions (LTC) by 2050. Nurses, managing their own
caseloads and clinics, working across sectors and organisational boundaries and as part of
a wider multi-disciplinary team, are frequently seen as key to managing this growing
demand. However, the evidence base informing the nursing role in managing LTC, the
most effective con?guration of the multi-disciplinary team and the policy evidence
relating to the infrastructure required to support cross organisational working, remains
weak.
Objectives: To explore, identify and characterise the origins, processes and outcomes of
effective chronic disease management models and the nursing contributions to such
models.
Design: Case study whole systems analysis using qualitative interview methods.
Settings: Two community matron services, two primary care (GP) practice nursing
services, two hospital based specialist nursing services were purposefully sampled from
across England and Wales.
Participants: Selection criteria were derived using a consensus conference. The nurses in
the service, all patients and carers on the caseload, members of the multi-disciplinary
team and stakeholders were invited to participate.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with all participants, thematic analysis within a
whole system framework.
Results: The study found high levels of clinical nursing expertise which in the case of the
community matrons was meeting the aim of reducing hospital admissions. Both the
primary care and hospital nurse specialist indicate similar levels of clinical expertise
which was highly valued by medical colleagues and patients. Patients continued to
experience fragmented care determined by diagnostic categories rather than patient need
and by the speci?c remit of the clinic or service the patient was using. Patient data systems
are still organised around the impact on services and prevalence of disease at an individual
level and not around the patient experience of disease.
Conclusion: Nurses are making a major contribution to meeting the policy objectives for long
term conditions. Primary care nurses and hospital nurse specialists do broadly similar roles.
The scope of the nursing roles and services studied were idiosyncratic, opportunistic and
reactive, rather than planned and commissioned on an analysis of local population need.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.007 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Case study, Chronic care model, Chronic disease management, Community matron, Long term conditions, Nurse specialists, Primary care nursing, Whole systems analysis |
Subjects: |
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC952 Geriatrics R Medicine > RT Nursing |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
Depositing User: | Tony Rees |
Date Deposited: | 08 Apr 2014 09:21 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:23 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/39064 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):