Hayward, Keith J., Young, Jock (2010) Mike Presdee (1944-2009) - cultural criminologist and champion of a life less ordinary. Crime Media Culture, 6 (1). pp. 105-110. ISSN 1741-6590. (doi:10.1177/1741659009363046) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:38052)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741659009363046 |
Abstract
Mike Presdee was a sociologist of international acclaim and considerable personal
magnetism. His work focused on the sociology of youth and cultural criminology. He was
fascinated by the way in which young people are criminalized and controlled; of youth
being seen as the problem rather than young people being the locus of the problems
of the system. Later in life he emerged as a key fi gure in the burgeoning fi eld of cultural
criminology, convinced of the impossibility of understanding crime (or any other form
of human behavior for that matter) in terms of survey data and quantitative analysis.
He argued that ‘numerical life’ had little if any relationship with ‘actual life’, that there
was a chronic split between academic knowledge, the gaze from above, and everyday
experience and the view from below revealed by ethnography and biography. He maintained
that orthodox criminology was driven by the administrative concerns of the
powerful which present problems as obvious and uncontested and set the research
agenda of the social scientist. Why he asks is it ‘obvious to all…that we need research into
the “evilness” of young people rather than the oppression of young people; the evils
of drink and drugs rather than why we take substances that might even include enjoyment
and the excitement of transgression’? (Presdee, 2004a). Such a power driven knowledge
presents itself as part of a rational research agenda where the very presence of
power is occluded. He then turns to the researchers themselves, noticing their poverty
of experience, their exclusion from the lived worlds of the people they research, thus
neatly reversing the conventional nostrum: it is the social scientist who is marginalized
from the social world rather than those deemed marginalized and objects of study.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/1741659009363046 |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Mita Mondal |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2014 10:08 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:22 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/38052 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):