Ilan, Jonathan (2009) Four years of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board: Assessing its impact. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, (1). pp. 54-77. ISSN 1649-1262. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:36562)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://www.jsijournal.ie/html/volumes_9_1.htm |
Abstract
Since the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) began operating in 2004, there has been considerable change and controversy injected into Ireland’s personal injury claims regime. Linked to wider measures designed to tackle a perceived runaway “compo culture” and spiralling insurance premiums,1 PIAB was specifically presented as a means of reducing the high levels of legal costs associated with negligence claims.2 Debate over the Board’s fairness and efficacy persists. Legal practitioners maintain that its lawyer-sceptical ideology is a snub to the legitimate rights of victims. As parties hold the option of retaining legal representation (albeit at their own expense) and to ultimately reject awards in favour of initiating litigation, the Board’s impact
is inherently tied to public acceptance of the new paradigm.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Mita Mondal |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2013 13:38 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:20 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/36562 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):