Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A. (1990) The context of discourse: Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Philosophical Psychology, 3 (2-3). pp. 219-225. ISSN 0951-5089. (doi:10.1080/09515089008573000) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:36061)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089008573000 |
Abstract
An examination of Ian Parker's definitions of discourse reveals them to be non?distinctive and of limited utility. It is argued that discourse analysis should be integrated with, rather than set against, social psychology. Discourse analysts should attend to the issues of the representativeness and generality of their evidence, should be wary of attributing causality to discourse, and should consider the advantages of systematically investigating, rather than asserting, the social consequences of the use of different discourses.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/09515089008573000 |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | M.L. Barnoux |
Date Deposited: | 06 Nov 2013 11:34 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:19 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/36061 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):