Castelli, Adriana and Nizalova, Olena (2011) Avoidable Mortality: What It Means And How It Is Measured. Project report. University of York (KAR id:35673)
PDF
Pre-print
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/r... |
Abstract
We explore in this research paper the concept of avoidable mortality and how the way it is measured
has evolved over time. Starting from an earlier review by Nolte and McKee (2004), we review the
empirical studies which have been produced since then. Finally we appraise the empirical
applications of the most recent literature. The concept of “avoidable mortality” refers, broadly
speaking, to all those deaths that, given current medical knowledge and technology, could be avoided
by the healthcare system through either prevention and/or treatment. It originates from the pioneering
work by Rutstein, Berenberg et al. (1976) which introduced the notion of „unnecessary untimely
deaths? as a new way to measuring the quality of medical care.
The most recent empirical literature shows that the notion of avoidable mortality continues to be used
to establish the extent to which people are dying from amenable conditions within and/or across
countries and over time, and whether socio-economic status and ethnicity are related to mortality from
amenable conditions. Most studies use data taken from national death registries, with only two which
link the concept of avoidable mortality to routinely collected administrative data of healthcare
provision, such as hospitals. A number of criticisms are raised, with probably the most remarkable
being the lack of association found between avoidable mortality and healthcare inputs. No study has
actually attempted to use the concept of avoidable mortality within the original aim envisaged by
Rutstein, i.e. as a quality indicator of healthcare provision.
We recommend for future work in this area to focus on investigating the link between the provision of
healthcare and the concept of avoidable mortality, with a particular emphasis on using routinely
collected administrative data, such as hospital discharge data.
Item Type: | Reports and Papers (Project report) |
---|---|
Additional information: | CHE Research Paper 63 |
Subjects: |
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Personal Social Services Research Unit Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Economics |
Depositing User: | Olena Nizalova |
Date Deposited: | 25 Oct 2013 15:16 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:19 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/35673 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):