Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

"Here is my honey-machine”: Sylvia Plath and the Mereology of the Beehive

Sleigh, Charlotte, Rogers, Janine (2012) "Here is my honey-machine”: Sylvia Plath and the Mereology of the Beehive. Review of English Studies, 63 (259). pp. 293-310. ISSN 0034-6551. (doi:10.1093/res/hgr106) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:31157)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/hgr106

Abstract

This article discusses Sylvia Plath’s ‘bee poems’, a short poetic sequence in her posthumous collection Ariel. These poems have been predominantly treated in relation to the most common themes in Plath scholarship: gender, psychology and what one might term the interpretative trap of biography. By approaching Plath’s bee sequence through poetic form and the history of entomology, however, we aim to reframe its interpretation. Bees, which had been the subject of her father’s scholarly study as well as her own amateur efforts, are suggestive of many of Plath’s important themes—gender, identity, family and so on. But as this article principally examines, their hive identity also provided her with a powerful means of examining her poetic practice. To focus upon Plath’s examination we employ the concept of mereology, the study of wholes and parts. Honeybees—whose individual existence is defined in relation to the whole of the hive—naturally placed the theme at centre stage in Plath’s poems. Together with their ‘outlier’ texts, the bee poems address the ‘wholes’ of poems and their ‘parts’ of words, the ‘whole’ of tradition and the ‘part’ of the poet. This article first focuses on the poetic sequence—of which the bee poems are an example—as a mereological question of literary form. Then, via a discussion of entomology that was contemporary to Plath, it treats apian self-organization as a possible model for poetry, and its implications for the question of authorship and reputation.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1093/res/hgr106
Subjects: D History General and Old World > D History (General)
P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of History
Depositing User: Z. Bliss
Date Deposited: 02 Oct 2012 12:55 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:09 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/31157 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.