Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Visit impacts and canyon management in the Blue Mountains, Australia: Canyoners' perspectives and wilderness management

Hardiman, Nigel, Burgin, Shelley (2010) Visit impacts and canyon management in the Blue Mountains, Australia: Canyoners' perspectives and wilderness management. Managing Leisure, 15 (4). pp. 264-278. ISSN 1360-6719. (doi:10.1080/13606719.2010.508667) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:30512)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2010.508667

Abstract

Recreation in natural areas has been promoted for numerous reasons (e.g., health, nature appreciation, education, financial gain) and leisure time spent in protected areas has increased substantially in popularity in recent decades. However, upkeep of such protected areas represents considerable financial outlay and to recoup these costs, tourism potentially provides a self-financing mechanism for ecological sustainability. In Australia, the adventure sport of canyoning has increased in popularity in the Blue Mountains National Park (Australia), part of a recently declared World Heritage Area, in parallel with an overall increase in wilderness recreation. This study sought canyoners’ perceptions of visit impacts, together with their attitudes to potential management of these unique areas. It also compares findings with American wilderness research outcomes. The results identify that the current level of traffic through the canyons was not considered to be detrimental to canyon visit enjoyment. While the findings were broadly similar, even at much lower visitation levels than American wilderness recreationists tolerate, Australian canyoners avoid heavily trafficked canyons. Although perceptions and attitudes differed with level of experience, overall, the conclusion is that the visitors encountered were tolerant of other canyoners and the discarded debris of past excursions. In this context, it is not surprising that most canyoners did not see an immediate need to implement further management restrictions.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/13606719.2010.508667
Uncontrolled keywords: human impact, wilderness experience, social impact, environmental impact, World Heritage recreation, visitation, experience level
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation. Leisure
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: N.J. Hardiman
Date Deposited: 18 Sep 2012 13:06 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:08 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/30512 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Hardiman, Nigel.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.