Aspinall, Peter J. (2010) Does the British state’s categorisation of 'mixed race' meet public policy needs? Social Policy and Society, 9 (1). pp. 55-69. ISSN 1474-7464. (doi:10.1017/S1474746409990194) (KAR id:29750)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/149kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746409990194 |
Abstract
The England and Wales 2001 Census was the first to include ‘Mixed’ categories which have now been adopted across government. The four ‘cultural background’ options were highly prescriptive, specifying combinations of groups. This paper assesses how satisfactorily these analytical categories captured self-ascribed cultural affiliation based on the criteria of validity, reliability and utility of the data for public services. Finally, the paper asks whether we now need a census question on ethnic origin/ancestry in addition to – or instead of – ethnic group or whether multi-ticking or a focus on family origins might give more useful public policy data and better measure the population's ethnic diversity.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1017/S1474746409990194 |
Subjects: |
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare J Political Science > JN Political institutions and public administration (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
Depositing User: | Peter Aspinall |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jun 2012 15:40 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:11 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/29750 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):