Curran, Eleanor (2012) Hobbes on Equality: Context, Rhetoric, Argument. Hobbes Studies, 25 (2). pp. 166-187. ISSN 0921-5891. (doi:10.1163/18750257-02502003) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:29469)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750257-02502003 |
Abstract
It is often argued that Hobbes’s arguments for natural and political equality are used instrumentally. This paper does not argue against the instrumental arguments but seeks to broaden the discussion; to analyse aspects of Hobbes’s arguments and comments on equality that are often ignored. In the context of the anti-egalitarian arguments of leading contemporary royalist commentators, Hobbes’s arguments and remarks are strikingly egalitarian. The paper argues, first, that there is an ideological disagreement between Hobbes and leading royalists on equality. Second, that Hobbes believes in natural equality as well as using the arguments for equality instrumentally.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1163/18750257-02502003 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | royalism; egalitarianism; Hobbes; ideological; equality |
Subjects: | K Law |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Depositing User: | Sarah Slowe |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2012 08:37 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:11 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/29469 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):