Pritchard, Diana J., Fa, John E., Oldfield, Sara, Harrop, Stuart R. (2012) Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation. Oryx, 46 (1). pp. 18-23. ISSN 0030-6053. (doi:10.1017/S0030605310001766) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:28221)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310001766 |
Abstract
In situ conservation is central to contemporary
global biodiversity protection and is the predominant
emphasis of international regulation and funding strategies.
Ex situ approaches, in contrast, have been relegated to
a subsidiary role and their direct contributions to conservation
have been limited. We draw on a variety of sources to
make the case for an enhanced role for ex situ conservation.
We note the advances occurring within institutions specializing
in ex situ conservation and stress that, although much
remains to be done, many constraints are being addressed.
We argue that the evidence of increasing extinction rates,
exacerbated by climate change, challenges the wisdom of
a heavy dependence on in situ strategies and necessitates
increased development of ex situ approaches. A number of
different techniques that enable species and their habitats to
survive should now be explored. These could build on the
experience of management systems that have already
demonstrated the effective integration of in situ and ex situ
techniques and hybrid approaches. For organizations specializing
in ex situ conservation to become more effective,
however, they will require tangible support from the
institutions of global biodiversity governance. Resistance is
anticipated because in situ conservation is entrenched
through powerful groups and organizations that exert
influence on global conservation policy and facilitate the
flow of funding. The chasm that has traditionally divided in
situ and ex situ approaches may diminish as approaches are
combined. Moreover, the relentless loss of the ‘wild’ may
soon render the in situ / ex situ distinction misleading, or
even obsolete.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1017/S0030605310001766 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Botanical gardens, captive breeding, climate change, ex situ, in situ, zoos. |
Subjects: |
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences S Agriculture > SB Plant culture S Agriculture > SF Animal culture |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology) |
Depositing User: | Stuart Harrop |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2011 12:18 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:09 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/28221 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):