Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

The Risk Society Hypothesis: an empirical test using longitudinal survey data

Taylor-Gooby, Peter, Cebulla, Andreas (2010) The Risk Society Hypothesis: an empirical test using longitudinal survey data. Journal of Risk Research, 13 (6). pp. 731-752. ISSN 1366-9877. (doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.488744) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:26162)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.488744

Abstract

This paper seeks to test the influential ‘risk society’ thesis using quantitative data from the major UK longitudinal surveys. Two hypotheses are derived from the thesis: distanciation (the claim that more recent generations understand and manage their social lives in relation to risk and uncertainty in substantially different ways from those of their parents’ generation) and reflexivity (the view that individuals are increasingly aware of their status in a detraditionalised social order and of their responsibility to manage their own life course).

Empirical testing shows that greater distanciation and reflexivity can be identified in a comparison of the education, employment and partnership experience of earlier and later cohorts, but that these factors vary substantially for different social groups. Success in planning one’s life and attaining the occupational status to which one initially aspired is increasingly associated with greater satisfaction and, with respect to career objectives, repeated change in jobs. But these outcomes are least likely to be available to those from the manual working class, especially those whose aspirations remain within that group. Risk society increasingly offers opportunities to ‘write one’s own biography’ but it is important to be clear that success in doing so is socially structured.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/13669877.2010.488744
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Peter Taylor-Gooby
Date Deposited: 16 Dec 2010 15:44 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:04 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/26162 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.