Butler, J.R. (1999) The modern doctor's dilemma: rationing and ethics in healthcare. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 92 (8). pp. 416-421. ISSN 0141-0768. (doi:10.1177/014107689909200815) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:24442)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC129732... |
Abstract
From one point of view, to talk about rationing and ethics is
to engage in subversion, for in the eyes of the UK
government there is no such thing as rationing in
healthcare. The Prime Minister has committed his
government to providing healthcare of a nationally attested
standard wherever and whenever it is needed, and ministers
have held unswervingly to the line that rationing is neither
necessary nor practised in the National Health Service1.
They insist that the NHS is still committed to providing
and is still providing-a comprehensive range of services
from the cradle to the grave. Rationing from this very
particular standpoint would mean the total removal of
certain services from the menu of availability through the
NHS, and this, ministers claim, is simply not happening.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/014107689909200815 |
Subjects: |
R Medicine B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
Depositing User: | Tony Rees |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jun 2011 14:05 UTC |
Last Modified: | 09 Mar 2023 11:32 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/24442 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):