Sayers, Sean (2007) The concept of labor: Marx and his critics. Science & Society, 71 (4). pp. 431-454. ISSN 0036-8237. (doi:10.1521/siso.2007.71.4.431) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:2295)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2007.71.4.431 |
Abstract
Marx conceives of labor as form-giving activity. This is criticized for presupposing a "productivist" model of labor which regards work that creates a material product - craft or industrial work - as the paradigm for all work (Habermas, Benton, Arendt). Many traditional kinds of work do not seem to fit this picture, and new "immaterial" forms of labor (computer work, service work, etc.) have developed in postindustrial society which, it is argued, necessitate a fundamental revision of Marx's approach (Hardt and Negri). Marx's theory, however, must be understood in the context of Hegel's philosophy. In that light, the view that Marx has a "productivist" model of labor is mistaken. The concept of "immaterial" labor is unsound, and Marx's ideas continue to provide an illuminating framework for understanding work in modern society.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1521/siso.2007.71.4.431 |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Culture and Languages |
Depositing User: | Suzanne Duffy |
Date Deposited: | 18 Mar 2008 16:51 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 09:33 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/2295 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):