Ray, Larry J. (2009) Profit of Innvation? Schumpeter and Classical Sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9 (3). pp. 347-352. ISSN 1468-795X. (doi:10.1177/1468795X09105448) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:22070)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468795X09105448 |
Abstract
The Austrian theorist Joseph Schumpeter (1883–1950) is not generally included
in discussions of classical sociology, although he was part of the political generation
that included Max Weber, Georg Simmel, Gustav von Schmoller and the German
Historical School. An economic theorist whose project was to synthesize insights
from sociology, social psychology, and cultural and historical studies of economics,
he has perhaps not been centrally established within any disciplinary boundary.
His best-known work, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942), has been
read more in political science and sociology than economics, and for a long time
his work was eclipsed by his contemporary and rival, John Maynard Keynes.
However, Schumpeter’s works, and especially his concept of ‘creative destruction’,
are currently receiving enthusiastic interest in business schools, which is illustrated
by Thomas McCraw’s major intellectual biography (Professor of Business History
in the Harvard Business School). McCraw’s volume is scholarly, thorough and
systematically grounded in a comprehensive range of Schumpeter’s published
works, personal papers and diaries as well as the recollections of both colleagues and
intimate friends. This was possible in part because, after his death, Schumpeter’s
widow and co-researcher, Elizabeth Boody, donated to Harvard his personal
papers unexpurgated (p. 494). McCraw’s study is bursting with documentation,
anecdotes and elaboration, and there is no sign here of the alleged decline and
fall of annotation – of the 700 odd pages, around 200 are endnotes, which will probably please some and annoy others, although the endnote material is often
essential reading.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/1468795X09105448 |
Additional information: | Review Essay: The book reviewed is McCraw, Thomas K: Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Schumpeter, classical sociology, creative destruction |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Laurence Ray |
Date Deposited: | 27 Nov 2009 15:24 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:01 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/22070 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):