N-version Design vs. One Good Version

Hatton, Leslie (1997) N-version Design vs. One Good Version. IEEE Software, 14 (6). pp. 71-76. ISSN 0740-7459. (doi:10.1109/52.636672) (KAR id:21442)

PDF Language: English
Download this file (PDF/19kB)
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.636672

Abstract

Evidence indicates that n-version development techniques are more reliable than producing one "good" version-and cost effective in the long run. The author concludes that diverse, independent channels used in parallel are significantly superior to even the current state of the art, especially in situations where cost of failure is high.

Item Type:	Article
DOI/Identification number:	10.1109/52.636672
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA 76 Software, computer programming,
Divisions:	Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing
Depositing User:	Mark Wheadon
Date Deposited:	25 Aug 2009 17:34 UTC
Last Modified:	05 Nov 2024 09:59 UTC
Resource URI:	https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/21442 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Depositors only (login required):

Altmetric

Download Statistics

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.