Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Money, Power and Inequality within Marriage

Vogler, Carolyn, Pahl, Jan M (1994) Money, Power and Inequality within Marriage. Sociological Review, 42 (2). pp. 263-288. ISSN 0038-0261. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1994.tb00090.x) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:20090)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1994.tb00090.x

Abstract

The growing body of research on the intra-household economy suggests that in couple households there are significant associations between control over household finances and more general power within the household. However, most earlier research has been based on relatively small samples. Here a major new British data set, produced by the Social Change and Economic Life Initiative, is used to examine the relations between money, power and inequality within marriage. Six different systems of financial allocation are identified. The results suggest that even when couples nominally pool their money, in practice either husband or wife is likely to control the pool. In only one fifth of couples was the pool jointly controlled, but these households were characterised by the highest levels of equality between husband and wife in terms of decision making, experience of deprivation and access to personal spending money. Findings from the study indicate a complex pattern of relationships between household income level, household allocative system and gender. Female control of finances, though it was associated with greater decision-making power for women, did not protect them against financial deprivation; however, male control of finances, especially when it took the form of the housekeeping allowance, did serve to protect the financial interests of men in comparison with women. Gender inequality was least in households with joint control of pooled money and greatest either in low income households or in higher income households with male control of finances.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1994.tb00090.x
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: P. Ogbuji
Date Deposited: 10 Jun 2009 06:15 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 09:57 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/20090 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Pahl, Jan M.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.