Manthorpe, Jill, Stevens, Martin, Rapaport, Joan, Harris, Jess, Jacobs, Sally, Challis, David J., Netten, Ann, Knapp, Martin R J., Wilberforce, Mark, Glendinning, Caroline and others. (2009) Safeguarding and system change: early perceptions of the implications for adult protection services of the English Individual Budgets pilots: a qualitative study. British Journal of Social Work, 39 (8). pp. 1465-1480. ISSN 0045-3102. (doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn028) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:15668)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn028 |
Abstract
Cash for care or consumer-directed services are increasing in scope and size in Europe
and North America. The English Department of Health initiated a pilot form of personalised
support for adults (Individual Budgets) in 13 local authorities that aimed to extend
opportunities for users of social care services to determine their own priorities and preferences
in the expectation that this will enhance their well-being. This article reports on
and discusses interviews undertaken with adult protection leads in the 13 Individual
Budgets sites about the linkages to their work, their perceptions of the launch of the
pilots and the policy s fit with safeguarding and risk agendas. The interviews were
undertaken as part of the national evaluation of the pilots, which aims to evaluate
outcomes and identify the contexts and mechanisms of those outcomes. Findings of
this part of the study were that the adult protection leads were not central to the
early implementation of Individual Budgets and that some of their concerns about
the risk of financial abuse were grounded in the extent of this problem among
current service users. The implications of their perceptions for the roll out of Individual
Budgets are debated in this article with a focus on risk and the policy congruence
between potentially competing agendas of choice and control and of protection and
harm reduction.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1093/bjsw/bcn028 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | adult protection, personalisation, social care, individual budgets, risk |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Personal Social Services Research Unit |
Depositing User: | R. Bass |
Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2009 13:37 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 09:50 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/15668 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):